<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Random Thoughts and Whatnot</title>
	<atom:link href="http://queenofswords.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/random-thoughts-and-whatnot/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://queenofswords.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/random-thoughts-and-whatnot/</link>
	<description>Speaking the truth and taking no prisoners.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Sep 2008 10:42:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: theobromophile</title>
		<link>http://queenofswords.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/random-thoughts-and-whatnot/#comment-1874</link>
		<dc:creator>theobromophile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Dec 2007 22:17:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://queenofswords.wordpress.com/2007/12/15/random-thoughts-and-whatnot/#comment-1874</guid>
		<description>Thank you! :)  I&#039;m done with two papers and just got out of CBA. Two exams left (Fed Jur and Health Law).  

As for the removal of the male anatomy from a male lion:
1.  Why are these women thinking about lions in a sexual way?
2.  If they are going to emasculate the lion (because guy lions are offensive?) shouldn&#039;t they also remove the mane?  After all, it&#039;s still a guy lion, just one with a high-pitched Rrrrrarrr!
3.  As my twin&#039;s sister-in-law said to her: &quot;Love the penis, [name], love the penis.&quot;  Sheesh.  
4.  Aren&#039;t these the same people who put on productions like the Vagina Monologues?  So vaginas are not only suitable for public mention, but there should be ART about them.  Not so much for men.  I mean, I&#039;m all about equal-opportunity modesty, but if you aren&#039;t going to be modest, you should at least have equal-opportunity exhibitionism.

Okay, I&#039;m beyond loopy.  Going to get something to eat that isn&#039;t coffee. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you! <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' />   I&#8217;m done with two papers and just got out of CBA. Two exams left (Fed Jur and Health Law).  </p>
<p>As for the removal of the male anatomy from a male lion:<br />
1.  Why are these women thinking about lions in a sexual way?<br />
2.  If they are going to emasculate the lion (because guy lions are offensive?) shouldn&#8217;t they also remove the mane?  After all, it&#8217;s still a guy lion, just one with a high-pitched Rrrrrarrr!<br />
3.  As my twin&#8217;s sister-in-law said to her: &#8220;Love the penis, [name], love the penis.&#8221;  Sheesh.<br />
4.  Aren&#8217;t these the same people who put on productions like the Vagina Monologues?  So vaginas are not only suitable for public mention, but there should be ART about them.  Not so much for men.  I mean, I&#8217;m all about equal-opportunity modesty, but if you aren&#8217;t going to be modest, you should at least have equal-opportunity exhibitionism.</p>
<p>Okay, I&#8217;m beyond loopy.  Going to get something to eat that isn&#8217;t coffee. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
